November 13, 2026 Understand what changes. Find what to use.

AI in practiceNews1 source

AI advances in translation, but humans are still needed for high-stakes work

AI translation is now considered suitable for many low-risk uses, but human review remains necessary for legal, medical and other sensitive work. Google said in April that Google Translate processes more than 1 trillion words a month, while direct sales of machine translation were estimated at $1.4 billion last year.

John Zimmerman, founder of the nonprofit OKA, says AI made it possible to translate more than 10,000 Wikipedia articles, with a person checking every sentence. But legal translator Ariella Baltié found errors in court documents, including translating “the plaintiff” as “the requester.” Medical translation specialist Carol Bereuter also described a case in which the Greek letter μ was interpreted as “milli” rather than “micro,” potentially resulting in a dose 1,000 times larger.

Why it matters · editorial interpretation

Machine translation can broaden access to low-risk content, but the examples involving legal documents and medical doses reinforce that human review remains a practical safeguard in sensitive contexts. The scale described also makes it important to distinguish acceptable uses from cases where an error could cause serious harm.

Sources

One story, many sources

Coverage of the same story gathered in one item, with a link to each original.

Summary and interpretation apart

What the sources say stays in the summary; editorial context is labeled separately.

Always with the source

Every story links to the original articles, and the full content belongs to them.